Union backs new dangerous dogs laws

The Government is set to announce plans to tackle dangerous dogs The Government is set to announce plans to tackle dangerous dogs

The Government has been accused of "dragging its feet" over cracking down on dangerous dogs ahead of an expected announcement of action to tackle the problem of attacks by violent animals.

Millions of dog owners will have to pay for their pets to be fitted with a microchip, under plans being announced on Monday, and ministers are expected to say that every newborn puppy should be fitted with a device giving details of who it belongs to.

An announcement is also expected on closing a loophole in the law so that dog owners will face prosecution if their pet attacks someone in their home.

The postal workers' union said action is "long overdue", pointing out that more than 10,000 people have signed an e-petition supporting changes to the law.

Billy Hayes, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, said: "It's about time the law bit back to protect innocent dog attack victims. Thousands of postal workers and telecom engineers - along with other workers who go on to private property and parents of small children - will sigh in relief at this announcement.

"We warmly welcome new laws and hope they will make the improvements desperately needed to the failed Dangerous Dogs Act.

"Government action is well overdue and unfortunately thousands of people have suffered debilitating injuries while the Government has dragged its feet.

"CWU has been calling for the law to apply on private property for years and we fully back compulsory microchipping to identify the owners of dogs and encourage more responsible dog ownership."

The union released details at its annual conference in Bournemouth on Sunday showing that 70% of the dog attacks on CWU members happened on private property where the law currently does not apply - effectively treating postal delivery workers and others as "criminal trespassers.

Angela McGlynn, whose four-year-old son John-Paul Massey was killed by an illegal breed of dog, described the microchip plans as a "start" but repeated her call for laws which would see dogs muzzled around children. She told she told BBC Breakfast: "You can get muzzles that allow the dog to eat and drink so that it is not restricting the dog, it is just restricting it from being able to bite."

Comments(1)

Oxdog 1 says...
11:37am Mon 23 Apr 12

This is not just about dangerous dogs (although the press always get hung up on this) and the facts should be reported correctly. Having your dog microchipped is proof of ownership should it get stolen and also helps re-unite with owner if lost. Let’s face it not many dog owners know that if your dog is out in public without a collar and tag this carries a max fine of £5000. I re-united a dog with its owner 18 months and 110 miles away after it was stolen and I was only able to do this through the microchip.
I am disappointed that it is new puppies only, it should be all dogs. For those people who say they can’t afford it then they really can’t afford to have a dog to start with!
What happens if it needs vet treatment, can they afford that?
Hats off to the responsible owners that already have their dog chipped and let’s get away from linking the chip to dangerous dogs. Please report this law responsibly it’s been a long time waiting.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree