Survey gives thumbs down to wind turbines

A NEW survey suggests there is strong opposition to the idea of installing wind turbines on Brown Clee.

This follows a survey conducted by Councillor Robert Tindall and Ludlow MP Philip Dunne.

They say that 445 residents of the Brown Clee area, 16% of all adults who live in the electoral division, responded to the survey.

Of these almost two thirds (64%) were against or strongly against wind turbine development, compared to fewer than one in five (17%) who were in favour or strongly in favour of it.

Nearly four times as many local residents who took part in the survey oppose wind turbines as approve.

The results also indicated worries about proliferation of turbines, with 68% concerned that approval of current applications would lead to more development in the future.

“Cllr Robert Tindall and I undertook this survey to get a sense of how local people felt on a wide range of issues,” said Mr Dunne.

“But our results clearly indicated strong opposition to wind development in the Brown Clee area, and there are particular concerns about proliferation of wind turbine development.

“These developments can affect local landscapes for years to come, and one only has to look over the border in mid-Wales to see how wind turbine proliferation can blight an area.

"Given that enough projects are in the pipeline to meet Britain’s renewable energy obligations, I believe any decision on local wind development should take into account the views of the local community, as well as issues such as landscape, heritage and ecology.”

Robert Tindall, Shropshire councillor for Brown Clee ward, believes it is an issue that provokes strong opinions.

“Wind turbine development is something local residents in Brown Clee feel very strongly about, which was reflected in our survey results,” he said.

“The local planning committee has shown it is responsive to local concerns about wind turbines in recent decisions, and I hope it will continue to take a robust view on remaining applications in my ward.

“The survey was also particularly revealing about the lack of reliable mobile phone signal and broadband in the area. More than half of those who responded said they had poor or no mobile phone signal, and almost two thirds said their broadband speeds were either slow or very slow.

“We have already written to Arqiva, responsible for delivering the Government’s Mobile Infrastructure Project, to ask what steps are being taken locally to improve mobile signal for residents, and will be feeding in our results to Shropshire Council’s Connecting Shropshire broadband programme.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

7:59am Sat 28 Jun 14

save energy says...

Ignoring aesthetics (beauty in eye of beholder), nimbys, noise, environment, local archaeology, wildlife welfare, property values, tourism etc, lets look at facts.-

• • According to the wind industry, UK has 1,278 Windfarms (may 2014) comprising – 9,912 Turbines, + approx 18,000 small units,
Total Capacity = 23 GW See - http://tinyurl.com/o
nf9wcv
But with all that capacity wind only contributes 5% to annual demand,
( UKs 16 nuclear stations contribute 20% to demand) • Lots more info from- Department of Energy & Climate Change ( DECC ) & Grid figs ( Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics ( DUKES) http://tinyurl.com/n
4k7n8 )

• • As I write this, wind is contributing just 0.7 GW (We are importing 5 x that from France & Holland ) a mere 2% to our UK grid demand !!
- Bookmark this - http://tinyurl.com/6
ja8btf •
It gives wind a production factor of just 2% (Gas is 70%).

• • See live production from your local RWE wind-farm - http://tinyurl.com/c
5b35rn
notes; 1. Capacity is in MW but output is kW so divide output by 1,000 to compare.
2. A minus fig indicates taking power from the grid to rotate blades.

• • And this is how much EXTRA we pay per mth for low density intermittent 'green' energy - http://tinyurl.com/l
rl8u49 - & yes the figs are £millions/mth !!

• • Do you really think that's a sensible way to use precious resources ??

It’s ALL about the subsidies…paid by us.


• • To see how little wind & solar contributes to our grid demand, load this app – http://www.gridwatch
.templar.co.uk/ - it auto updates every 5 mins.

• • And don’t start me off about the so called ‘community benefits’, (Google- ponzi scam ).
They take our money, give a small % back & we are supposed to see that as a benefit !!!

• It is a very dangerous world, when politics & money, trump science & engineering facts.
Ignoring aesthetics (beauty in eye of beholder), nimbys, noise, environment, local archaeology, wildlife welfare, property values, tourism etc, lets look at facts.- • • According to the wind industry, UK has 1,278 Windfarms (may 2014) comprising – 9,912 Turbines, + approx 18,000 small units, Total Capacity = 23 GW See - http://tinyurl.com/o nf9wcv But with all that capacity wind only contributes 5% to annual demand, ( UKs 16 nuclear stations [Total Capacity = 10GW] contribute 20% to demand) • Lots more info from- Department of Energy & Climate Change ( DECC ) & Grid figs ( Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics ( DUKES) http://tinyurl.com/n 4k7n8 ) • • As I write this, wind is contributing just 0.7 GW (We are importing 5 x that from France & Holland ) a mere 2% to our UK grid demand !! - Bookmark this - http://tinyurl.com/6 ja8btf • It gives wind a production factor of just 2% (Gas is 70%). • • See live production from your local RWE wind-farm - http://tinyurl.com/c 5b35rn notes; 1. Capacity is in MW but output is kW so divide output by 1,000 to compare. 2. A minus fig indicates taking power from the grid to rotate blades. • • And this is how much EXTRA we pay per mth for low density intermittent 'green' energy - http://tinyurl.com/l rl8u49 - & yes the figs are £millions/mth !! • • Do you really think that's a sensible way to use precious resources ?? It’s ALL about the subsidies…paid by us. • • To see how little wind & solar contributes to our grid demand, load this app – http://www.gridwatch .templar.co.uk/ - it auto updates every 5 mins. • • And don’t start me off about the so called ‘community benefits’, (Google- ponzi scam ). They take our money, give a small % back & we are supposed to see that as a benefit !!! • It is a very dangerous world, when politics & money, trump science & engineering facts. save energy
  • Score: 4

10:32pm Sun 29 Jun 14

hoseman says...

Surveys are funny things. You can often get the answer you want by carefully choosing the people you poll. Was the survey done by choosing people at random? How was that achieved. Before one dismisses wind-power as unwanted it might be good to check that this poll was done properly. 64% of 17% is not a majority, its less than 11% of the population of the area.
Surveys are funny things. You can often get the answer you want by carefully choosing the people you poll. Was the survey done by choosing people at random? How was that achieved. Before one dismisses wind-power as unwanted it might be good to check that this poll was done properly. 64% of 17% is not a majority, its less than 11% of the population of the area. hoseman
  • Score: 1

8:43am Mon 7 Jul 14

Rita Jelfs says...

445 is not a research survey. 16% is certainly not a significant enough number either. Biased.
445 is not a research survey. 16% is certainly not a significant enough number either. Biased. Rita Jelfs
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree